Student Discovery AI Software Mind Uploading Robotic Hardware

The above image clearly shows a human brain being kept artificially alive and functioning through AI technology.

We were informed that the image is from a laboratory testing site in Asia and released through a ‘certified source’ relating to biological AI advancement and artificial intelligence technology.

It was sent to us by a student of information technology from Aberdeen.

We have no way of knowing if it’s real or not, but it certainly would be mind blowing if it was real.

At its simplest form, artificial intelligence is a field, which combines computer science and robust datasets, to enable problem-solving, but with saying that can the human brain really survive outside the human body through AI support systems like the image above seems to be suggesting?

We do not believe that it is true and it very well may be a mock up image.

But the real thing may not be very far away in time!

AI encompasses sub-fields of machine learning and deep learning, which are frequently mentioned in conjunction with artificial intelligence.

These disciplines are comprised of AI algorithms which seek to create expert systems which make predictions or classifications based on input data.

A captivating blog like this blog consists of content that intrigues, teases, and maybe even astonishes the reader – whatever the point of interest of the article itself – and on this blog we never fail to deliver.

It is now absolutely beyond any doubt or dispute that Art Abstract Expressionism Artist UK is now one of the very best and one of the most famous top recommended student website art blogs in the history of the World Wide Web concerning the Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, NFT Tokens, Cryptocurrency, Web3 and of course the Metaverse itself in totality. There is no better art website blog other than Art Abstract Expressionism Artist UK at this point in time. We really are quite simply the very best and most Google searched, top ranking and top trending, most popular and famous art blog that you will find anywhere on the internet today.

The wish to extend the human lifespan has a long tradition in many cultures.

Optimistic views of the possibility of achieving this goal through the latest developments in medicine feature increasingly in serious scientific and philosophical discussion.

The research with the explicit aim of extending the human lifespan is both undesirable and morally unacceptable.

They present three serious objections, relating to justice, the community and the meaning of life.

If the computational hypothesis of brain function is correct, it suggests that an exact replica of your brain will hold your memories, will act and think and feel the way you do, and will experience your consciousness — irrespective of whether it’s built out of biological cells, Tinkertoys, or zeros and ones.

The important part about brains, the theory goes, is not the structure, it is about the algorithms that ride on top of the structure. So if the scaffolding that supports the algorithms is replicated — even in a different medium — then the resultant mind should be identical.

If this proves correct, it is almost certain we will soon have technologies that allow us to copy and download our brains and live forever in silica.

We will not have to die anymore. We will instead live in virtual worlds like the Matrix.

We assume there will be markets for purchasing different kinds of afterlives, and sharing them with different people — this is future of social networking.

Once you are downloaded, you may even be able to watch the death of your outside, real-world body, in the manner that we would view an interesting movie.

While medicine will advance in the next half century, we are not on a crash-course for achieving immortality by curing all disease. Bodies simply wear down with use.

We are on a crash-course, however, with technologies that let us store unthinkable amounts of data and run gargantuan simulations.

Therefore, well before we understand how brains work, we will find ourselves able to digitally copy the brain’s structure and able to download the conscious mind into a computer.

Every part of the human body is complex, soft and susceptible to wear and tear.

Our brains, in particular, are fantastically complex, and it is difficult to imagine that a repair and maintenance approach to extending lifespan could maintain brain function indefinitely.

On the other hand, if human consciousness could be uploaded on to a computer it is conceivable that, with adequate servicing of the computer hardware and software, we could live forever.

We could either live as cyborgs with a non-biological computer-based consciousness plus a biological body augmented with mechanical parts or we could be entirely non-biological, that is, computer-based consciousness and entirely mechanical bodies.

This post suggests that medically the term a ‘human being’ should be defined by the presence of an active human brain.

The brain is the only unique and irreplaceable organ in the human body, as the orchestrator of all organ systems and the seat of personality.

Thus, the presence or absence of brain life truly defines the presence or absence of human life in the medical sense.

When viewed in this way, human life may be seen as a continuous spectrum between the onset of brain life in utero (eight weeks gestation), until the occurrence of brain death.

At any point human tissue or organ systems may be present, but without the presence of a functional human brain, these do not constitute a ‘human being’, at least in a medical sense.

The implications of this theory for various ethical concerns such as in vitro fertilisation and abortion are discussed.

This theory is the most consistent possible for the definition of a human being with no contradictions inherent.

However, having a good theory of definition of a ‘human being’ does not necessarily solve the ethical problems discussed herein.

The human brain rapidly dissolves after death due to the break down of proteins and putrefaction.

Decomposition often occurs within minutes after death, which is quicker than other body tissues, likely because the brain is about 80% water.

Rotting starts in normal ambient temperature at about 3 days, and the brain is essentially vaporized within 5-10 years.

For this reason, anthropologists can study the skulls, teeth, and bones of our distant ancestors, but we cannot study their brains.

The advent of “deliberate mummification”, using chemicals, has allowed long-term preservation of soft tissues.

We see this in the Egyptian mummies at museums.

The Egyptians also performed “excerebration” in which they removed the brains with iron hooks through the nose prior to embalming, so we don’t have the pharaoh’s brains to examine.

Natural mummification can occur at extreme temperatures.

Freezing has been shown to preserve rare brains of icemen in glaciers.

On the opposite side of the spectrum, extreme heat has “preserved” certain aspects of the brain tissue.

Recently described in the New England Journal of Medicine was an ancient brain from Pompeii which was vitrified (turned into glass) from the extreme heat of the Mount Vesuvius eruption in 79CE.

Due to the sudden exposure to heat greater than 9680 Fahrenheit and then cooling, the proteins and fatty acids can be thermally preserved.