Rhythms of Abstraction in the Works of Mariia Denysenko and Natalia Kungurova

By LUSYA YANGIROVA

The painting practices of Mariia Denysenko and Natalia Kungurova confidently align with the contemporary European tradition of fine art. Both artists favour abstraction over figurative narrative, choosing to prioritise the freedom of viewer interpretation. What unites their approach is a shared sense of experimentation — a dialogue between academic foundations and more fluid, exploratory decisions.




Abstract painting speaks the language of emotion and state of being. As a genre, it resists a singular or rigid reading. In the work of both artists, painting becomes a visual echo of their internal rhythms — rhythms that resonate instinctively with the viewer.


Mix Feelings by Mariia Denysenko


Mix Feelings by Mariia Denysenko
Mix Feelings by Mariia Denysenko

Mariia Denysenko’s series Mix Feelings, comprising two canvases, leans towards the legacy of abstract expressionism. Her vibrant palette — rich with contrasts between deep greens, soft blues, and a red tinged with orange — creates an emotional atmosphere that the artist herself describes as an “emotional journey.” This journey is not directed by linear narrative, but by immersion — the colours and gestures guiding us through states of tension, release, and reflection.




Large areas of colour and sweeping brushstrokes command the viewer’s attention, delivering a visual intensity that borders on the dramatic. Though figuration may seem to surface at times — as though a figure might be emerging from the composition — it remains an illusion, quickly dissolving into colour and form. Red appears to function as a central rhythmic device in this series. It anchors the viewer’s gaze, acting almost as a visual metronome against the more subdued tones surrounding it. The red doesn’t shout, but it insists — energising the entire composition and pushing the emotional tempo forward.

Advertise on The World Art News

In certain works, the suggestion of figuration is built not through shape but through palette. This method draws a subtle line back to Wassily Kandinsky’s theoretical text Point and Line to Plane, in which the pioneer of abstraction treated painting as a system of relationships — colour and form becoming analytical tools rather than merely expressive ones. Denysenko’s work offers a contemporary echo of this lineage, yet remains unburdened by rigid theory, allowing intuition and emotion to rise to the surface.


Deformation and Confluence by Natalia Kungurova


Deformation and Confluence by Natalia Kungurova
Deformation and Confluence by Natalia Kungurova

Natalia Kungurova’s paired works Deformation and Confluence seem to be in direct conversation with one another — not in harmony, but in tension. Where one speaks of quietude and equilibrium, the other bursts with movement and energetic disruption.

Kungurova cites Gerhard Richter as a major influence, and this dialogue with the German master is evident in her sensitivity to colour. Her compositions are less about contrast and more about flow — soft lilacs and azure blues interspersed with white, forming an atmospheric, near-liquid surface. Despite her use of acrylics, her technique evokes the fluid transitions of watercolour — with gradients that bleed gently into one another and a sense of translucency that allows each colour to “breathe.”




Though the paintings vary in mood, they are united by their palette and by Kungurova’s deliberate focus on texture. In both works, the artist plays with undulating, wave-like brushwork — building not just imagery but sensation. The result is a flowing visual rhythm that feels almost tactile.

Her exploration of maritime themes is particularly subtle — rather than depicting seascapes directly, Kungurova isolates elements such as “sea foam,” transforming them into abstract forms. This approach recalls a lineage of imagery stretching from the mythological (The Birth of Venus) to the monstrous (the rise of the Kraken in popular culture). The marine becomes a metaphor, fragmented and reassembled into new emotional contexts.




Her preference for small formats is also noteworthy. Presented in a mosaic-like installation, these works function as modular elements — each piece part of a larger visual conversation. They encourage close looking and quiet contemplation, rewarding attention with detail.

Non-objective art always leaves space for interpretation, while simultaneously raising questions about the role of intuition versus intention. In the work of Natalia Kungurova and Mariia Denysenko, we see a compelling fusion of emotional spontaneity with thoughtful, deliberate use of composition and colour. Their painting practices are testaments to how abstract art, when rooted in personal rhythm and aesthetic clarity, continues to invite — and reward — deep engagement.


Also Read

Anastasia Egonyan’s Visual Dichotomies: Personal Figures, Impersonal Cities


Sponsored content. Story submitted by Irina Evseenko. The World Art News (WAN) is not liable for the content of this publication. All statements and views expressed herein are opinions only. Act at your own risk. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission. © The World Art News

The post Rhythms of Abstraction in the Works of Mariia Denysenko and Natalia Kungurova appeared first on World Art News.

The Carracci Cartoons: Myths in the Making at the National Gallery

The Carracci Cartoons: Myths in the Making at the National Gallery

From April 10 to July 6, 2025, the National Gallery in London presents the exhibition “The Carracci Cartoons: Myths in the Making”.

Source: National Gallery · Image: Agostino Carracci, ‘A Woman borne off by a Sea God’, about 1599 © The National Gallery, London

This is a rare chance to see these works which, at nearly four metres wide and two metres tall and in the delicate medium of charcoal and white chalk, are not often displayed. The works came into the National Gallery collection in 1837 as part of a gift by Lord Francis Egerton. Prior to this they had been owned by the artist Sir Thomas Lawrence.

These immense drawings were made in preparation for the painted ceiling in the gallery of one of Rome’s greatest Renaissance palaces, the Palazzo Farnese (now the site of the French Embassy in Rome). They were created as part of a commission by Odoardo Farnese (1573–1626), the younger son of the duke of Parma who had been made cardinal at the age of 18 and was seeking to decorate the family palace he had inherited in 1592. To do so, he turned to the Carracci brothers, outstanding artists from Bologna who came to visit the cardinal in 1594. 

Once in Rome, Annibale and Agostino Carracci took inspiration from antique sculptures and celebrated works of painters such as Michelangelo and Raphael, creating an idealised image of the classical world that celebrated the loves of the gods. The ‘Galleria Farnese’ as it came to be called was enormously influential on future generations of artists.  

These two enormous drawings are the work principally of Agostino, the older of the two, but Annibale may also have played a part in their execution. They show two scenes inspired by Ovid’s Metamorphoses. As cartoons they were created as part of the preparation for the frescoed ceiling in the Farnese Gallery and would have been used to transfer the design to the wet plaster. Their survival is unusual and as such speaks to the significance given to the drawings shortly after their creation. This presentation will offer a unique insight into both the techniques used to create monumental frescoes, and the Carracci brothers’ own creative process of design and refinement.